Creation of the mobile phone brand ‘au’
In Japan, mobile phones are an indispensable tool for both work and social life, and the cumulative number of contracts as of November 2006 was around 95 million. When the age group that does not use such phones is subtracted, this represents more than one telephone per person. The mobile phone however was introduced only two decades ago when NTT launched a fully fledged service in 1987 that had evolved from the car phone. In 1988, the Toyota affiliated IDO Corporation established a service and was followed in 1989 by the Kyocera affiliated Cellular group companies (DDI group), bringing a wave of animation to the market. Subsequently, triggered by introduction of the independent sale of handsets in 1994, entry into the market of the Digital Phone, Tu-Ka Digital Phone, and Tu-Ka group companies caused purchase price and monthly charges to drop at a stroke. In a field bristling with competition, all companies had a hard time securing market share, and for a time the only horse in the race was NTT, which attracted customers simply because the public trusted the name. A new development came in 1999 with the merger under the J-PHONE brand, of Digital Phone and Tu-Ka Digital Phone, which had suffered poor business performance. In July 2000, ‘au’ was created as a brand bringing together IDO and the Cellular group companies. The market now entered its current four-brand phase, the other three being NTT DoCoMo, which had already spun off from NTT; Vodafone, the successor brand to J-PHONE; and TU-KA.
‘au’ in the doldrums
Despite such a new start, ‘au’ recorded a net decrease and right away was faced with a struggle. At the time, the main focus of mobile phone competition was shifting from ‘voice services’ to ‘data services’, and the emotional experience provided by such phones had come to be emphasized. Unable to respond to these trends, ‘au’ had not introduced the products and services that users wanted. ‘Their commercials are fun but their products are too tense’ was a frequent comment. The gap between the image portrayed in advertisements and the actual products also became a problem. As for brand image, while DoCoMo enjoyed a reputation for reliability and J-PHONE benefited from a fashionable image, ‘au’ lacked appealing products and services; introducing a student discount under these circumstances meant that it ended up with the image of a low-priced and low-quality service for students.
’au’ recovery scenario
In order to respond with a clear statement of brand value, the target core users were defined as ‘people who already use a mobile phone in their daily routine and want to make their lives richer and more individual’. The value, personality, and brand promise offered by ‘au’ were codified. Additionally, a five-year period was divided into three phases with goals and key strategies formulated as part of the definition of the ‘au’ brand. In concrete terms, building on the foundation that a telecommunications corporation and business enterprise needed to provide as a matter of course (e.g. a stable telecommunications environment, congenial service at retail outlets, products and services that meet user needs), it began to radiate to users a unified ‘au-ness’ by offering something extra. This meant being the first to offer new and unique products and services. By improving its image among users, regardless of whether they had an ‘au’ mobile phone, the company attempted to develop into a corporation seen as having potential. Also, by offering value specific to ‘au’, it made efforts to differentiate itself from other companies and formulated a scenario of superiority through overall brand strength. The ‘au’ brand was vigorously promoted as a combination of all these elements.
’au’ brand growth
Following launch of a clear statement concerning the ‘au’ brand identity, in addition to design strategies to enhance brand strength, a series of strategies on the service and pricing fronts were also rolled out. These bore fruit, and ‘au’, which at one point had been relegated by the impact of J-PHONE’s photo mail service to number three in the industry, gradually began to win back popularity from the end of 2001. In 2006, NTT DoCoMo continues to boast the greatest cumulative market share, but in terms of net increase, ‘au’ is top for the third year running and has won a rating as ‘the mobile phone company with the highest level of customer satisfaction’. In October 2006, Japan introduced a number portability system which allows users to switch mobile phone company without changing their number. ‘au’, born through the merger of private enterprises, sees this as a chance to make a major stride forward. Determined to consistently move faster than NTT’s DoCoMo, once a public corporation, it is striving to build an independent and strong brand position.